You can choose which cookies you allow.
Read about how we manage personal data and cookies.
About us
Research
Education
Impact
Publications
News & events
Meet our team
Our research is regularly published in top-ranked scientific journals. Search for specific publications below
Journal / article | 2017
Bowen, K.J., N.A. Cradock-Henry, F. Koch, J. Patterson, T. Hayha, J. Vogt, F. Barbi. 2017. Implementing the ”Sustainable Development Goals”: towards addressing three key governance challenges-collective action, trade-offs, and accountability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26-27: 90-96
Realising the aspirations of the “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) to reduce inequality, limit ecological damage, and secure resilient livelihoods is a grand challenge for sustainability science, civil society and government. We identify three key governance challenges that are central for implementing the SDGs: (i) cultivating collective action by creating inclusive decision spaces for stakeholder interaction across mult...
Journal / article | 2016
Häyhä, T., Lucas, P.L., van Vuuren, D.P., Cornell, S.E. and Hoff, H. 2016. From Planetary Boundaries to national fair shares of the global safe operating space—How can the scales be bridged?. Global Environmental Change 40: 60-72.
The planetary boundaries framework proposes quantitative global limits to the anthropogenic perturbation of crucial Earth system processes, and thus marks out a planetary safe operating space for human activities. Yet, decisions regarding resource use and emissions are mostly made at less aggregated scales, by national and sub-national governments, businesses, and other local actors. To operationalize the planetary boundaries ...
van Vuuren, D. P., P. L. Lucas, T. Häyhä, S. E. Cornell, M. Stafford-Smith. 2016. Horses for courses: analytical tools to explore planetary boundaries. Earth System Dynamics, 7: 267–279.
There is a need for more integrated research on sustainable development and global environmental change. In this paper, we focus on the planetary boundaries framework to provide a systematic categorization of key research questions in relation to avoiding severe global environmental degradation. The four categories of key questions are those that relate to (1) the underlying processes and selection of key indicators for plane...
Journal / article | 2015
Bull, J.W., N. Jobstvogt, A. Böhnke-Henrichs, A. Mascarenhas, N. Sitas, C. Baulcomb, C.K. Lambini, M. Rawlins, H. Baral, J. Zähringer, E. Carter-Silk, M.V. Balzan, J.O. Kenter, T. Häyhä, K. Petz, R. Koss. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosystem Services doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.012
The ecosystem services concept (ES) is becoming a cornerstone of contemporary sustainability thought. Challenges with this concept and its applications are well documented, but have not yet been systematically assessed alongside strengths and external factors that influence uptake. Such an assessment could form the basis for improving ES thinking, further embedding it into environmental decisions and management. The Young Eco...
Häyhä, T., P.P. Franzese, A. Paletto, B.D. Fath. 2015. Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosystem Services 14: 12–23
Forests support human economy and well-being with multiple ecosystem services. In this paper, the ecosystem services generated in a mountainous forest area in North Italy were assessed in biophysical and monetary units. GIS was used to analyze and visualize the distribution and provision of different services. The assessment of ecosystem services in biophysical units was an important step to investigate ecosystem functions a...
Journal / article | 2014
Häyhä, T., P.P. Franzese 2014. Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecological Modelling, 289, 124-132
A comprehensive understanding of interlinked ecological-economic systems requires integration of different theoretical frameworks and assessment methods. This paper reviews the main definitions, classifications, and methodological approaches used to identify, assess, and value stocks of natural capital and flows of ecosystem services. A synthesis of the major developments in the field of ecosystem services assessmentis provide...
Stockholm Resilience Centre is a collaboration between Stockholm University and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Follow us:
Phone: +468 16 2000
Organisation number: 202100-3062
VAT No: SE202100306201
Contact
Press
Intranet
Site map
Privacy policy